Vijay Sappani - November 22, 2007
Canada is uniquely positioned to be a leader in armed conflict resolution, but will it choose to do it?
"The best way to secure Israel's long-term survival is for a complete and permanent withdrawal from the West Bank and Gaza and to cede these territories to a legitimately elected Palestinian Authority in control of an internationally recognized sovereign state living in peace, side-by-side with an Israel secure within its own borders and free of terror from its neighbours. This remains true even if you accept that there are terrorists in the Arab world who will never be content unless Israel is driven into the sea."
-Michael Ignatieff
I agree with M.Ignatieff on this. Israel should take bold steps to work with the moderates and the elected government of Abbas which now works only in west Bank after been overthrown by the Hamas in Gaza. An independent Palestine state should come into existence with the support of international community and the sufferings of the people should be addressed by monetary support from Israel, G-8, WB, IMF and the organization of Islamic countries among other groups.
No geographical dispute can be resolved through armed struggle and over five decades of conflict has left a generation living and running in fear. Temporary peace might come through gun power, but sustained peace will come through strong bonding between the citizens of Israel and independent Palestine. Israel is a fast growing economy and needs skilled labour to meet its demand. Palestine has high unemployment and little scope for development after years of war.
This is an excellent example of supply and demand. Economic independence of Palestinians given by Israel will create a bonding beyond wages. It will give a chance for Palestinians to live with self esteem with the help if Israel. Israel fighting terrorists in Palestine stand a lesser chance of winning than Palestinians stopping their own brethren from attacking Israel. Terrorism in the Indian province of Punjab is a good example. There were human rights issues and when the government of India rectified it and empowered the local citizens, they turned their back on the terrorists many of whom fled to US, UK, Canada and other countries. Today, Punjab is one of the most prosperous state in India and Sikhs hold some of the highest positions in India including the Prime Minister and Chief of Army.
Canada has a history of peace keeping, but it does look like we have to live in the glory of our past. As I have said many times in this blog, Canada is uniquely placed to be the world leaders in peace advocacy and armed conflict resolution, but we have chosen not to do so. It is not to blame any political party for it, but to look into the future and create a multi partisan peace advocacy group. Canada has no political, military or major economic interest in the middle east unlike the other current power brokers like US and UK. Our successful functioning federal system is an excellent example of an efficient system for co-existence that can be model to be explored for many regions.
Canada needs a permanent peace advocacy group(Harper can score brownie points if he created a separate ministry for peace advocacy) consisting of politicians, diplomats
and civilian advocates who can influence peace. Canada is blessed with people like Bob Rae, Michael Ignatieff, Alexa McDonald, Lloyd Axworthy, B.Mulroney and many other experts who will make an excellent team along with several diplomats who can put Canada back on the top as global peace makers, a honor we held decades ago and let it slide to countries like Norway, US, Japan.
I am not sure what our chances are of bringing back the Stanley cup to Canada, but It is time to bring back the Noble peace prize back to Canada and we have the right team to do it in Middle East.
Digg this entry
Add to Del.icio.us
Share on Facebook
Subscribe
Posted by Vijay Sappani at November 22, 2007 06:33 AM
Thanks for signing in, . Now you can comment. (sign out)
(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)Thanks for signing in, . Now you can comment. (sign out)
(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)
Is Canada actually thinking of doing this? Or i
Is Canada actually thinking of doing this? Or is it just something you wished they would do?
"Canada has no political, military or major economic interest in the middle east unlike the other current power brokers like US and UK."
Unfortunately, the very same fact will keep the powers that have a stake in it from being serious about peace. The Bush Administration and the Christian Right do not want peace in the Middle east. They want war, because it fulfills their apocalyptic beliefs, and it feeds the disaster capitalism industry.
The Israeli government does not seem to want peace either. Finally they have succeeded in splitting the Palestinians against themselves and they like that.
The PEOPLE of all these countries want peace, but those running their governments pursue their self-interests through war.
Now matter how good Canada or any third party might be, they are not going to be able to forge agreements when none of the principal players want to. They have even given up the pretense of doing it for show in the last few years.
Sure, all players say they want peace, then they go on to make demands on the other players that they know will never be fulfilled.
The governments of the US and Israel, and I am not as informed about the Palestinian government(s), have become increasingly disconnected with the citizens of their own nations.
The US government pretty much governs AGAINST the will of the people nowadays, and especially with regard to the Middle East, the UK seems locked in a similar situation. There are a lot of Israeli citizens who disagree with their goverment too, but it seems locked in a hypnotic trance on its trainride to disaster.
Which is, of course, how the end-timers want it to be. And there are many companies who are crying for a new Iraq type situation, because the bottom line of their companies are totally dependent on foreign wars.
Suffice it to say that in the Knesset, as well as the White House, the voices of peace are being shoved aside to feed religious prejudice and the greed of the disaster capitalists.
If Canada thinks it can undo all that with some good faith negotiating, hey, I'm all for it.
I will be very happy to be proved wrong on every count I have mentioned. It would be a much better world if I am wrong.
Hopefully you'll be able to prove me wrong and make me eat my words.
In this case, I would relish the meal.