Brilliant, I love it :))))))

It's the latest MoveOn.org campaign...

"Make Sure All Your Friends Vote

We all know people who might not vote this year. So we created this funny news video about Obama losing by a single vote. It's a great, fun, scary way to remind everyone you know to vote. Can you send this video to your friends? (You can send yourself the video, too.)"

http://www.cnnbcvideo.com/index.html

I knew the way Deepak trashed the right all the time that it was all a charade.

If only.....

Deepak and Moveon.org together?

What a shock!

MoveOn.org has over 4 million registered grassroot members in their list -- a lot of republicans included.

...

You maybe interested to know that MoveOn is the inspiration for Avaaz.org (which also has millions of members) that was cited by some intentblog members -- Ruth, Bonnie et al -- in the past for their 'global' initiatives.

"MoveOn is a co-founder of Avaaz.org, a civic organization that promotes progressive political action on issues such as climate change and religious conflicts."

ROFL Fun !!!

Very funny.

To some Americans this is very funny too, unfortunately it is not meant to be:
Crazy Tracy - This is Why America is Broken - From "Now on PBS"

http://ca.youtube.com/watch?v=-4wQfQtpDAc

That was a strange video.

Char.. its a joke video.. there are many circulating like these... you can put ur friend's name in it, and the non-voter will become ur friend.. notice they don't say "deepak chopra" anywhere, its only written.. so when u put ur friend's name, the software will replace it...

Ref #7

http://ca.youtube.com/watch?v=-4wQfQtpDAc
This video is no longer available due to a copyright claim by Jumpstart Productions.

Jumpstart Production my foot! Could it be a Jumpstart Election try by someone who is down and almost out?

Yes, I know that the video is a joke, but I don't find it funny and I feel that it brings bad vibes ... just my opinion, that's all.

PS: In short, I don't like the video, but again, that's my own personal thoughts.

Aloha Everyone

I have to agree with Char. I didn't like it. Maybe if our elections were honest i would feel different, but to guilt the person voting doesn't seem right. Americans are dumbed down enough. Why not share something like this:

Former presidential candidate Ron Paul was interviewed Friday morning by CNN anchor John Roberts on "American Morning."

Rep. Ron Paul says that what really needs regulating is the Federal Reserve.

Paul, a Republican from Texas, spoke from his home in Clute, Texas. The topic of the discussion was the current economic crisis and the Capitol Hill testimony Thursday of former Fed chief Alan Greenspan.

John Roberts, CNN anchor: Up there on the Hill, Alan Greenspan was basically saying, "Oops, I missed this one, sorry about it," but he was optimistic for the future. Congressman Paul, do you even listen to him anymore?

Rep. Ron Paul: I have to because somebody like you might ask me a question about him.

No, I don't really listen in the sense that I'm going to get a lot of new information. I used to listen to him when he was writing back in the '60s because he agreed with free market economics and no respect for the Federal Reserve.

Lately, though, I mean, he's been part of -- and right now he's really gotten bad because what he was saying yesterday was that the only place where he might have made a mistake is he didn't advocate more regulations.

Well, if you're a true free market person it isn't the lack of regulations. Trying to regulate and improve on the conditions that the government creates. I mean we created this problem. The Federal Reserve created this. The Community Reinvestment Act created it. The FDIC created it. Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac created it.

Don't Miss
CNN/Money: U.S. stocks join global selloff
CNN/Money: Fed heads toward uncharted territory
CNN/Money: Credit choked on recession angst
It was all seen there but now he says if we could have only had more regulations ...

Roberts: Right.

Paul: ... we could have salvaged this clogged system.

Roberts: Well, you believe that markets can be or should be self-regulating?

Paul: Well, to a degree, but the government does have a responsibility to deal with fraud, but the monetary system is fraudulent. Instead of perpetuating fraud in the monetary system they should be dealing with real fraud.

But just regulating prices -- that's what they're doing now, they're trying to regulate prices and set prices for these assets that hasn't -- have no value. So, no, that's not the kind of regulation we want, but there is certainly a role for regulations.

We should be regulating the Federal Reserve system is what we really ought to be regulating.

Roberts: Well, regardless of what we talk about this morning, the Dow is going to go off a cliff again today so let me turn to politics if I could.

A lot of people have said, particularly because of the economy, this is a bad year to be a Republican. John McCain behind in the national polls, seems to be behind in the battleground states as well. He's got a long and difficult road if he hopes to win the Oval Office.

If Republicans really take a beating, Congressman Paul, on November the 4th, where does that leave the Republican brand?

Paul: Well, I think they're in big trouble, but I think I mentioned that a year or so ago, that they've sort of lost their way. No, it's going to be a lot worse, but you have to say that the markets aren't being reassured about the obvious victory that's going to occur.

Then they said, "Oh, my, you know, we're going to have Obama and a Democratic Congress stronger than ever so things are going to get a lot better." They haven't discounted that yet.

The country is in a mess regardless, but I think the Republican Party really in a mess because ...

Roberts: I mean, I mean how ...

Paul: ... they'll probably lose a fair amount of seats again.

Roberts: How bad a blow could it be and how long might it take the party to rebuild?

Paul: You know, I was first elected -- I first ran in 1974, and I think there were about 145 members of Congress, Republicans, then. It took 20 years. So that is the case. But, you know, I think it's secondary to what the Congress is doing.

If both parties have bad ideas, it doesn't matter a whole lot. Right now ...

Roberts: And I wanted to ask you about ...

Paul: ... I think both parties follow those ideas.

Roberts: You're on the ballot in a couple of states. You're on the ballot in Louisiana. You're also on the ballot in Montana, and in Montana you were polling 4 percent there.

That's exactly the difference between Senator McCain and Barack Obama with Barack Obama on top. I mean you could be the spoiler here and take Montana away from Senator McCain, and I know that some Republicans, friendly to you, say hey, get off the ballot in Montana. You tried, you couldn't.

How are you going to feel if because of you McCain loses Montana?

Paul: Well, I think it will be a pretty far stretch if McCain loses the election that they're going to blame me. I haven't been campaigning in Montana. People who are supporting out there are spontaneous. They're enthusiastic. They don't like either candidate.

So I don't think the person whose name they picked is the one that does the spoiling. I think there's something else that is wrong. Maybe it's the flawed policies of both candidates.

Roberts: Congressman Paul, it's always good to see you. Thanks for joining us this morning. We'll check back with you again soon.

Paul: Thank you. Good to be with you.

From the Blogs: Controversy, commentary, and debate

Top News
Early voting surge may signal historic turnout Obama delivers 'closing argument'

If only an intelligent man like Deepak would see the light and not vote for Obama! I know he has the intelligence!

Go Obama!

The next President of the United States of America.

Go Obama!