Intent - November 29, 2008

Overcoming Suffering
There are two kinds of suffering: the suffering that leads to more suffering and the suffering that leads to the end of suffering.
If you are not willing to face the second kind of suffering, you will surely continue to experience the first.—Ajah Chah, Still Forest Pool
Ajah Chah’s wise statement rings so true about human condition. Most of us are so afraid to suffer a little in the short term that we unwittingly elect to bear the cross for the most part of our life. Even though we all want to get rid of suffering and lead a happy and healthy life, sometimes our delusional thinking and narrow-minded approach to life can eventually cement the very thing we were trying to get rid of. How many times do we end up being unhappy while trying to be happy? Why does that happen? Why do our honest efforts sometimes bring about exactly the opposite of what we were looking for?
Buddhist philosophy explains this paradox. It says that we suffer from three things: Suffering of suffering, Suffering of change and All-pervasive suffering. Going a little deeper into these concepts reveal what hampers us from getting rid of suffering. For one, it is our fundamental misunderstanding of the basic laws of life which perpetuates the cycle of suffering and pain.
Let us explore these three precepts further. The first, Suffering of suffering is easier to understand. If for example, you have a toothache, you will be doing everything to relieve that pain: may be by visiting a dentist or resorting to short term pain-killing methods or anything which brings relief to you. Every time you feel pain, it is normal human reaction to avoid it or find a solution for. Roughly, this precept relates to suffering at physical level or due to material shortage.
The second one, Suffering of change, is more devious and is probably a source of endless hardships in our life. It is this precept which we should take seriously while going through daily business of eating, speaking, shopping, relating, etc. Suffering of change means that our mind has difficult time hanging on to a source/thing for permanent satisfaction. Say for example, as Dalai Lama points out, you bought a new car and buying so assumed that this new car will always bring you permanent source of happiness and satisfaction. But that really does not happen, if you recall. Very soon when excitement wore off, you fell back into the old state of dissatisfaction. The car which you enjoyed and were so eager to buy one day no longer brings you the same kind of enjoyment. You will be itching to get a new one, thinking that the newer car will bring that elusive satisfaction. This is what is called suffering of change. We suffer because we our mind is never content with what we have—it is always keeping us on the run, one goal after another.
This mindset, and its resultant consequences, is also reinforced by our consumerist culture. We are told that if you are not satisfied with one thing, buy another or buy an expensive one. But we forget in this circus that the person who buys the stuff remains the same; regardless of what s/he owns or wears; if there is no contentment in heart nothing else is going to quash that annoying feeling of ‘not being home’. A miserable person wearing designer labels or driving luxury car still remains miserable!
Third precept is called all-pervasive suffering and is considered to be birthplace for the first two categories. In order to get rid of all the suffering we go through, it advocates, we need to seek liberation from the very causes which lie at the heart of all the mental afflictions. Buddhists believe that it is only when we seek liberation at a deeper level that we come to understand how we unwittingly keep on creating unhappiness for ourselves and others.
To deal with suffering, we need to get to the bottom of its deeper causes. It is not sufficient to attend to shallow causes because that kind of approach provides only ad-hoc solutions. In our society, we have become used to these kinds of ad-hoc approaches and it is reflected in almost every conceivable sphere of human activity. For example, we have destroyed our environment while trying to make quick bucks or asserting control over natural resources; we have created an egoistic medicine where medication is more respected than the person whom it is being fed; our social fabric is under increasing tremendous strain because we are so smitten by ‘our independent life style’; we are always trying to act against nature or life as aggressors through ‘conquest of cancer, battle against heart diseases, beating stress, etc.’ as if these diseases are curse from evil external force. Even our language is militaristic. This separatist attitude toward problems, as if they have descended from outer space without our bidding, keeps us from finding durable solutions to our personal as well as social problems.
It is only when we think of life, its problems and inter-connection with everybody around that we come to understand the real causes of the problems. Getting rid of mental afflictions and social problems is a possible task as long as we are willing to look for their real causes without resorting to cosmetic solutions. It is a hard road, but worthwhile.
The real question is: do we want to have an enduring riddance from afflictions or a temporary escape? The answer to that question will determine our own intention and willingness to embark upon a fruitful mission.
You can visit my website at http://www.ParmjitSingh.org
Digg this entry
Add to Del.icio.us
Share on Facebook
Subscribe
Posted by Intent at November 29, 2008 11:59 PM
We are given so much advice nowadays on how to live our lives, hereunder a practical wisdom in the form of a joke:
Movement: I walk to the retailer
Fruit: I drink a glass of wine
Vegetables: I put some celery in my bloody Mary
Fresh air: I drink it outside on the terrace
Against stress: I tell some jokes, laughing heartily
Rest: Then I fall asleep.
So the way I see it: as long as I keep the alcohol up to the mark, I will keep my health in the length of days :)
Cheers!
Nice to see your post Parmjit,as I do enjoy them. Thanks for the wise advice.
Cheers, Char
In my personal life, I have experienced twice - 'the suffering that leads to the end of suffering' Both were very painful decisions at that point of time, made on the advice of a very understanding and persuasive medical proffesionals, who were also good humanitarian at the same time.
I do dabble in some sort of social service, which is basically community centric, and many a times I have come across the first form mentioned by Pramjit Singh - 'suffering that leads to more suffering' in cases of terminally ill cancer patients and others with permanent disability.
I have seen cases, where a person having medical insurance coverage, is made to undergo several medical tests and therapies, which are not required in the first place.
A medical practioner acts very differently in cases where the a person is covered by medical insurance, in cases where one does not have the insurance cover. I have termed it 'Insurance Virus' It is more lethal, as gives a false security, and the patient keeps on suffering, the medical costs keep on rising.
I know of a case where in a reputed hospital facility, the Insurance Agent found out from the hospital record, the details of the cancer patient admitted, and contacted the spouce to get an Insurance cover.
The family was fortunate to receive sage advice, the patient was also very stoic, 'let me bear my own cross' The suffering ended soon, without much of medical intervention.
http://mindmints.blogspot.com/2008/05/death-is-but-dropping-of-flower.html
Thanks for signing in, . Now you can comment. (sign out)
(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)Thanks for signing in, . Now you can comment. (sign out)
(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)In my personal life, I have experienced twice -
Nice to see your post Parmjit,as I do enjoy the
We are given so much advice nowadays on how to
Well dear Parmjit,
The age old paradox
Well dear Parmjit,
The age old paradox :)
Yes Buddhism explains it well.
Ancient societies knew about the paradox because they were so much more closely connected to nature.
In these days we all are re-membering how to deal with it, each in our natural own way :)
http://www.heartphone.org/meandering_thoughts_about_the_la.htm